notes from the underground-第6部分
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
some day they calculate and prove to me that I made a long nose
at someone because I could not help making a long nose at him and
that I had to do it in that particular way; what _freedom_ is
left me; especially if I am a learned man and have taken my
degree somewhere? Then I should be able to calculate my whole
life for thirty years beforehand。 In short; if this could be
arranged there would be nothing left for us to do; anyway; we
should have to understand that。 And; in fact; we ought
unwearyingly to repeat to ourselves that at such and such a time
and in such and such circumstances nature does not ask our leave;
that we have got to take her as she is and not fashion her to
suit our fancy; and if we really aspire to formulas and tables of
rules; and well; even 。。。 to the chemical retort; there's no help
for it; we must accept the retort too; or else it will be
accepted without our consent 。。。。〃
Yes; but here I come to a stop! Gentlemen; you must excuse me
for being over…philosophical; it's the result of forty years
underground! Allow me to indulge my fancy。 You see; gentlemen;
reason is an excellent thing; there's no disputing that; but
reason is nothing but reason and satisfies only the rational side
of man's nature; while will is a manifestation of the whole life;
that is; of the whole human life including reason and all the
impulses。 And although our life; in this manifestation of it; is
often worthless; yet it is life and not simply extracting square
roots。 Here I; for instance; quite naturally want to live; in
order to satisfy all my capacities for life; and not simply my
capacity for reasoning; that is; not simply one twentieth of my
capacity for life。 What does reason know? Reason only knows
what it has succeeded in learning (some things; perhaps; it will
never learn; this is a poor comfort; but why not say so frankly?)
and human nature acts as a whole; with everything that is in it;
consciously or unconsciously; and; even it if goes wrong; it
lives。 I suspect; gentlemen; that you are looking at me with
compassion; you tell me again that an enlightened and developed
man; such; in short; as the future man will be; cannot
consciously desire anything disadvantageous to himself; that that
can be proved mathematically。 I thoroughly agree; it canby
mathematics。 But I repeat for the hundredth time; there is one
case; one only; when man may consciously; purposely; desire what
is injurious to himself; what is stupid; very stupidsimply in
order to have the right to desire for himself even what is very
stupid and not to be bound by an obligation to desire only what
is sensible。 Of course; this very stupid thing; this caprice of
ours; may be in reality; gentlemen; more advantageous for us than
anything else on earth; especially in certain cases。 And in
particular it may be more advantageous than any advantage even
when it does us obvious harm; and contradicts the soundest
conclusions of our reason concerning our advantagefor in any
circumstances it preserves for us what is most precious and most
importantthat is; our personality; our individuality。 Some;
you see; maintain that this really is the most precious thing for
mankind; choice can; of course; if it chooses; be in agreement
with reason; and especially if this be not abused but kept within
bounds。 It is profitable and some… times even praiseworthy。 But
very often; and even most often; choice is utterly and stubbornly
opposed to reason 。。。 and 。。。 and 。。。 do you know that that; too;
is profitable; sometimes even praiseworthy? Gentlemen; let us
suppose that man is not stupid。 (Indeed one cannot refuse to
suppose that; if only from the one consideration; that; if man is
stupid; then who is wise?) But if he is not stupid; he is
monstrously ungrateful! Phenomenally ungrateful。 In fact; I
believe that the best definition of man is the ungrateful biped。
But that is not all; that is not his worst defect; his worst
defect is his perpetual moral obliquity; perpetualfrom the days
of the Flood to the Schleswig…Holstein period。 Moral obliquity
and consequently lack of good sense; for it has long been
accepted that lack of good sense is due to no other cause than
moral obliquity。 Put it to the test and cast your eyes upon the
history of mankind。 What will you see? Is it a grand spectacle?
Grand; if you like。 Take the Colossus of Rhodes; for instance;
that's worth something。 With good reason Mr。 Anaevsky testifies
of it that some say that it is the work of man's hands; while
others maintain that it has been created by nature herself。 Is
it many…coloured? May be it is many…coloured; too: if one takes
the dress uniforms; military and civilian; of all peoples in all
agesthat alone is worth something; and if you take the undress
uniforms you will never get to the end of it; no historian would
be equal to the job。 Is it monotonous? May be it's monotonous
too: it's fighting and fighting; they are fighting now; they
fought first and they fought lastyou will admit; that it is
almost too monotonous。 In short; one may say anything about the
history of the worldanything that might enter the most
disordered imagination。 The only thing one can't say is that
it's rational。 The very word sticks in one's throat。 And;
indeed; this is the odd thing that is continually happening:
there are continually turning up in life moral and rational
persons; sages and lovers of humanity who make it their object to
live all their lives as morally and rationally as possible; to
be; so to speak; a light to their neighbours simply in order to
show them that it is possible to live morally and rationally in
this world。 And yet we all know that those very people sooner or
later have been false to themselves; playing some queer trick;
often a most unseemly one。 Now I ask you: what can be expected
of man since he is a being endowed with strange qualities?
Shower upon him every earthly blessing; drown him in a sea of
happiness; so that nothing but bubbles of bliss can be seen on
the surface; give him economic prosperity; such that he should
have nothing else to do but sleep; eat cakes and busy himself
with the continuation of his species; and even then out of sheer
ingratitude; sheer spite; man would play you some nasty trick。
He would even risk his cakes and would deliberately desire the
most fatal rubbish; the most uneconomical absurdity; simply to
introduce into all this positive good sense his fatal fantastic
element。 It is just his fantastic dreams; his vulgar folly that
he will desire to retain; simply in order to prove to himselfas
though that were so necessarythat men still are men and not the
keys of a piano; which the laws of nature threaten to control so
completely that soon one will be able to desire nothing but by
the calendar。 And that is not all: even if man really were
nothing but a piano…key; even if this were proved to him by
natural science and mathematics; even then he would not become
reasonable; but would purposely do something perverse out of
simple ingratitude; simply to gain his point。 And if he does not
find means he will contrive destruction and chaos; will contrive
sufferings of all sorts; only to gain his point! He will launch
a curse upon the world; and as only man can curse (it is his
privilege; the primary distinction between him and other
animals); may be by his curse alone he will attain his
objectthat is; convince himself that he is a man and not a
piano…key! If you say that all this; too; can be calculated and
tabulatedchaos and darkness and curses; so that the mere
possibility of calculating it all beforehand would stop it all;
and reason would reassert itself; then man would purposely go mad
in order to be rid of reason and gain his point! I believe in
it; I answer for it; for the whole work of man really seems to
consist in nothing but proving to himself every minute that he is
a man and not a piano…key! It may be at the cost of his skin;
it may be by cannibalism! And this being so; can one help being
tempted to rejoice that it has not yet come off; and that desire
still depends on something we don't know?
You will scream at me (that is; if you condescend to do so) that
no one is touching my free will; that all they are concerned with
is that my will should of itself; of its own free will; coincide
with my own normal interests; with the laws of nature and
arithmetic。
Good heavens; gentlemen; what sort of free will is left when we
come to tabulation and arithmetic; when it will all be a case of
twice two make four? Twice two makes four without my will。 As
if free will meant that!
IX
Gentlemen; I am joking; and I know myself that my jokes are not
brilliant;but you know one can take everything as a joke。 I am;
perhaps; jesting against the grain。 Gentlemen; I am tormented by
questions; answer them for me。 You; for instance; want to cure
men of their old habits and reform their will in accordance with
science and good sense。 But how do you know; not only that it is
possible; but also that it is _desirable_ to reform man in that
way? And what leads you to the conclusion that man's
inclinations _need_ reforming? In short; how do you know that
such a reformation will be a benefit to man? And to go to the
root of the matter; why are you so positively convinced that not
to act against his real normal interests guaranteed by the
conclusions of reason and arithmetic is certainly always
advantageous for man and must always be a law for mankind? So
far; you know; this is only your supposition。 It may be the law
of logic; but not the law of humanity。 You think; gentlemen;
perhaps that I am mad? Allow me to defend myself。 I agree that
man is pre…eminently a creative animal; predestined to strive
consciously for an object and to engage in engineeringthat is;
inc