the history of the common law of england-及11何蛍
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
ompleat�察�because none remains to call it in Question。 But suppose they are beaten in one Battle�察�may they not rally again�拭�Or if the greater Part be subdued�察�may not the lesser keep their Ground�拭�Or if they do not at the present�察�may they not in the next Age regain their Liberty�拭�Or if they be quiet for a Time�察�may they not as they have Opportunity�察�renew their Pretentions�拭�And altho' the Victor�察�by his Power�察�be able to quell and suppress them�察�yet he is beholden to his Sword for it�察�and the Right that he got by his Victory before�察�would not be sufficient without a Power and Force to establish and secure him against new Troubles。 And on the other Side�察�if those few subdu'd Persons can by Force regain what they once had a Pretence to�察�a former Victory will be but a weak Defence�察�and if it would�察�they would have the like Pretence to a Claim of Acquest by Victory over him�察�as he had over them。 It seems therefore a difficult Thing to determine in what indivisible Moment this Victory is so compleat�察�that Jure Belli the Acquest of Dominion is fully gotten�察�and therefore Victors use to secure themselves against Disputes of that Kind�察�and as it were to under´pin their Acquest Jure Belli�察�that they might not be lost by the same Means�察�whereby they were gained by the Continuation of eternal Forces of Standing Armies�察�Castles�察 �Garrisons�察�Munitions�察�and other Acts of Power and Force�察�so as thereby to over´bear and prevent an ordinary Possibility of the Prevailing of the conquered or subdued People�察�against the Conqueror or Victor。 He that lays the Weight of his Title upon Victory or Conquest�察�rarely rests in it as a compleat Conquest�察 �till he has added to it somewhat of Consent or Faith of the conquered�察�submitting voluntarily to him�察�and then�察�and not till then�察�he thinks his Title secure�察�and his Conquest compleat�此�And indeed�察�he has no Reason to think his Title can be otherwise secure�察�for where the Title is meerly Force or Power�察�his Title will fail�察�if the conquered can with like Force or Power over´match his�察�and to regain their former Interest or Dominion。 Now this Consent is of Two Kinds�察�either Express'd�察�or Imply'd。 An express Consent is�察�when after a Victory the Party conquered do expresly submit themselves to the Victors�察�either simply or absolutely�察�by Dedition�察�yielding themselves�察�giving him their Faith and their Allegiance�察�or else under certain Pacts�察�Conventions�察�Agreements�察�or Capitulations�察�as when the subdued Party�察�either by themselves�察�or by Substitutes�察�or Delegates by them chosen�察�do yield their Faith and their Allegiance to the Victor upon certain Pacts or Agreements between them�察�as for holding or continuing their Religion�察�their Laws�察 �their Form of Civil Administration�察�&c。 And thus�察�tho' Force were perhaps the Occasion of this Consent�察�yet in Truth 'tis Consent only that is the true proximate and fix'd Foundation of the Victor's Right�察�which now no longer rests barely upon external Force�察�but upon the express Consent and Pact of the subdu'd People�察�and consequently this Pact or Convention is that which is to be the immediate Foundation of that Dominion�察�and upon a &iligent Observation of Most Acquests gotten by Conquest�察�or so called�察�we shall find this to be the Conclusion of almost all Victories�察�they end in Deditions and Capitulations�察�and Faith given to the Conqueror�察 �whereby oftentimes the former Laws�察�Privileges�察�and Possessions are confirmed to the Subdued�察�without which the Victors seldom continue long or quiet in their New Acquests�察�without extream Expence�察�Force�察�Severity and Hazard。 An implied Consent is�察�when the Subdued do continue for a long Time quiet and peaceable under the Government of the Victor�察 �accepting his Government�察�submitting to his Laws�察�taking upon them the Offices and Employments under him�察�and obeying and owning him as their Governor�察�without opposing him�察�or claiming their former Right。 This seems to be a tacit Acceptance of�察�and Assent to him�察�and tho' this is gradual�察�and possibly no determinate Time is stinted�察�wherein a Man can say�察�this Year�察�or this Month�察�or this Day�察�such a tacit Consent was compleated and concluded�此�For Circumstances may make great Variations in the Sufficiency of the Evidence of such an Assent�察�yet by a long and quiet Tract of peaceable Submission to the Laws and Government of the Victor�察�Men may reasonably conjecture�察�that the conquered have relinquished their Purpose of regaining by Force what by Force they lost。 But still all this is intended of a lawful Conquest by a Foreign Prince or State�察�and not an Usurpation by a Subject�察 �either upon his Prince or Fellow Subject�察�for several Ages and Discents do not purge the Unlawfulness of such an Usurpation。 Secondly。 Concerning the several Kinds of Conquests�察�and their Effects�察�as to the Alteration of Laws by the Victor。 There seems to be a double kind of Conquest�察�which induces a various Consideration touching the Change of Laws�察�viz。 Victoria in Regem & Populum�察�& Victoria in Regem tantum。 The Conquest over the People or Country�察�is when the War is denounced by a Prince or State Foreign�察�and no Subject�察�and when the Intention and Denunciation of the War is against the King and People or Country�察�and the Pretention of Title is by the Sword�察�or Jure Belli�察�such were most of the Conquests of ancient Monarchs�察�viz。 The Assyrian�察�Persian�察�Graecian�察�and Roman Conquests�察�and in such Cases�察�the Acquisitions of the Victor were absolute and universal�察�he gain'd the Interest and Property of the very Soil of the Country subdued�察�which the Victor might�察�at his Pleasure�察 �give�察�fell or arrent�此�He gain'd a Power of abolishing or changing their Laws and Customs�察�and of giving New�察�or of imposing the Law of the Victor's Country。 But although this the Conqueror might do�察�yet a Change of the Laws of the conquered Country was rarely universally made�察�especially by the Romans�此�Who�察�though in their own particular Colonies planted in conquered Countries�察�they observed the Roman Law�察�which possibly might by Degrees�察�without any rigorous Imposition�察�gain and insinuate themselves into the conquered People�察�and so gradually obtain�察�and insensibly conform them�察�at least so many of them as were conterminous to the Colonies and Garrisons to the Roman Laws�察�yet they rarely made a rigorous and universal Change of the Laws of the conquered Country�察�unless they were such as were foreign and barbarous�察�or altogether inconsistent with the Victor's Government�此�But in other Things�察�they commonly indulged unto the conquered�察�the Laws and Religion of their Country upon a double Account�察�viz。 First。 On Account of Humanity�察�thinking it a hard and oversevere Thing to impose presently upon the conquered a Change of their Customs�察�which long Use had made dear to them。 And�察 �2dly。 Upon the Account of Prudence�察�for the Romans being a wise and experienced People�察�found that those Indulgences made their Conquests the more easy�察�and their Enjoyments thereof the more firm�察�when as a rigorous Change of the Laws and Religion of the People would render them in a restless and unquiet Condition�察�and ready to lay hold of any Opportunity of Defection or Rebellion�察 �to regain their ancient Laws and Religion�察�which ordinary People count most dear to them�察。�though at this Day the Indulgence of a Paganish Religion is not used to be allowed by any Christian Victor�察�as is observed in Calvin's Case in the Seventh Report�撮� and to give One Instance for all�察�it was upon this Account�察�That though the Romans had wholly subdued Syria and Palestina�察�yet they allow'd to the Inhabitants the Jews�察�&c。 the Use of their Religion and Laws�察�so far forth as consisted with the Safety and Security of the Victor's Interest�此�And therefore�察�though they reserved to themselves the Cognizance of such Causes as concern'd themselves�察�their Officers or Revenues�察�and such Cases as might otherwise disturb the Security of their Empire�察�as Treasons�察 �Insurrections�察�and the like�察�yet 'tis evident they indulged the People of the Jews�察�&c。 to judge by their own Law�察�not only of some Criminal Proceedings�察�but even of Capital in some Cases�察�as appears by the History of the Gospels�察�and Acts of the Apostles。 But still this was but an Indulgence�察�and therefore was resumable by the Victor�察�unless there intervened any Capitulation between the Conqueror and the Conquered to the contrary。 which was frequent�察�especially in those Cases�察�when it was not a compleat Conquest�察�but rather a Dedition upon Terms and Capituiations�察�agreed between the Conqueror and the Conquered�察 �wherein usually the yielding Party secured to themselves�察�by the Articles of their Dedition�察�the Enjoyment of their Laws and Religion�察�and then by the Laws of Nature and of Nations�察�both which oblige in the Observation of Faith and Promises�察�those Terms and Capitulations�察�were to be observed。 Again�察�2dly。 When after a full Conquest�察�the conquered People resumed so much Courage and Power as began to put them into a Capacity of regaining their former Laws and Liberties。 This commonly was the Occasion of Terms and Capitulations between the Conquerors and Conquered。 Again�察�3dly。 When by long Succession of Time�察�the Conquered had either been incorporated with the conquering People�察�whereby they had worn out the very Marks and Discriminations between the Conquerors and Conquered�察�and if they continued distinct�察�yet by a long Prescription�察�Usage and Custom�察 �the Laws and Rights of the conquered People were in a Manner settled�察�and the long Permission of the Conquerors amounted to a tacite Concession or Capitulation�察�for the Enjoyment of their Laws and Liberties。 But of this more than enough is said�察�because it will appear in what follows�察�That William I never made any such Conquest of England。 Secondly�察�Therefore I come to the Second Kind of Conquest�察 �viz。 That which is only Victoria in Regem�此�And this is where the Conqueror either has a real Right to the Crown or chief Government of a Kingdom�察�or at least has�察�or makes some Pretence of Claim thereunto�察�and�察�in Pursuance of such Claim�察�raises War�察 �and by his Forces obtains what he so pretends a Title to。 Now this