robert louis stevenson-第15部分
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！
； and he made Flint； what there is of him； and he made this here mutiny； you keep such a work about； and he had Tom Redruth shot； and … well； if that's a Author； give me Pew！〃
〃Don't you believe in a future state？〃 said Smollett。 〃Do you think there's nothing but the present sorty…paper？〃
〃 I don't rightly know for that；〃 said Silver； 〃and I don't see what it's got to do with it； anyway。 What I know is this： if there is sich a thing as a Author； I'm his favourite chara'ter。 He does me fathoms better'n he does you … fathoms； he does。 And he likes doing me。 He keeps me on deck mostly all the time； crutch and all； and he leaves you measling in the hold； where nobody can't see you； nor wants to； and you may lay to that！ If there is a Author； by thunder； but he's on my side； and you may lay to it！〃
〃I see he's giving you a long rope；〃 said the Captain。 。 。 。
Stevenson's stories … one and all … are too closely the illustrations by characters of which his essays furnish the texts。 You shall not read the one wholly apart from the other without losing something … without losing much of the quaint； often childish； and always insinuating personality of the writer。 It is this if fully perceived which would justify one writer； Mr Zangwill； if I don't forget； in saying； as he did say； that Stevenson would hold his place by his essays and not by his novels。 Hence there is a unity in all； but a unity found in a root which is ultimately inimical to what is strictly free dramatic creation … creation； broad； natural and unmoral in the highest sense just as nature is； as it is to us； for example； when we speak of Shakespeare； or even Scott； or of Cervantes or Fielding。 If Mr Henley in his irruptive if not spiteful PALL MALL MAGAZINE article had made this clear from the high critical ground； then some of his derogatory remarks would not have been quite so personal and offensive as they are。
Stevenson's bohemianism was always restrained and coloured by this。 He is a casuistic moralist； if not a Shorter Catechist； as Mr Henley put it in his clever sonnet。 He is constantly asking himself about moral laws and how they work themselves out in character； especially as these suggest and involve the casuistries of human nature。 He is often a little like Nathaniel Hawthorne； but he hardly follows them far enough and rests on his own preconceptions and predilections； only he does not； like him； get into or remain long in the cobwebby corners … his love of the open air and exercise derived from generations of active lighthouse engineers； out at all times on sea or land； or from Scottish ministers who were fond of composing their sermons and reflecting on the backwardness of human nature as they walked in their gardens or along the hillsides even among mists and storms； did something to save him here； reinforcing natural cheerfulness and the warm desire to give pleasure。 His excessive elaboration of style； which grew upon him more and more； giving throughout often a sense of extreme artificiality and of the self…consciousness usually bred of it； is but another incidental proof of this。 And let no reader think that I wish here to decry R。 L。 Stevenson。 I only desire faithfully to try to understand him； and to indicate the class or group to which his genius and temperament really belong。 He is from first to last the idealistic dreamy or mystical romancer； and not the true idealist or dealer direct with life or character for its own sake。 The very beauty and sweetness of his spirit in one way militated against his dramatic success … he really did not believe in villains； and always made them better than they should have been； and that； too； on the very side where wickedness … their natural wickedness … is most available … on the stage。 The dreamer of dreams and the Shorter Catechist； strangely united together； were here directly at odds with the creative power； and crossed and misdirected it； and the casuist came in and manoeuvred the limelight … all too like the old devil of the mediaeval drama； who was made only to be laughed at and taken lightly； a buffoon and a laughing…stock indeed。 And while he could unveil villainy； as is the case pre…eminently in Huish in the EBB…TIDE； he shrank from inflicting the punishments for which untutored human nature looks； and thus he lost one great aid to crude dramatic effect。 As to his poems； they are intimately personal in his happiest moments： he deals with separate moods and sentiments； and scarcely ever touches those of a type alien to his own。 The defect of his child poems is distinctly that he is everywhere strictly recalling and reproducing his own quaint and wholly exceptional childhood； and children； ordinary； normal； healthy children； will not take to these poems （though grown…ups largely do so）； as they would to； say； the LILLIPUT LEVEE of my old friend； W。 B。 Rands。 Rands showed a great deal of true dramatic play there within his own very narrow limits； as； at all events； adults must conceive them。
Even in his greatest works； in THE MASTER OF BALLANTRAE and WEIR OF HERMISTON； the special power in Stevenson really lies in subduing his characters at the most critical point for action； to make them prove or sustain his thesis； and in this way the rare effect that he might have secured DRAMATICALLY is largely lost and make…believe substituted； as in the Treasure Search in the end of THE MASTER OF BALLANTRAE。 The powerful dramatic effect he might have had in his DENOUEMENT is thus completely sacrificed。 The essence of the drama for the stage is that the work is for this and this alone … dialogue and everything being only worked rightly when it bears on； aids； and finally secures this in happy completeness。
In a word； you always； in view of true dramatic effect； see Stevenson himself too clearly behind his characters。 The 〃fine speeches〃 Mr Pinero referred to trace to the intrusion behind the glass of a part…quicksilvered portion； which cunningly shows； when the glass is moved about； Stevenson himself behind the character； as we have said already。 For long he shied dealing with women； as though by a true instinct。 Unfortunately for him his image was as clear behind CATRIONA； with the discerning； as anywhere else； and this； alas！ too far undid her as an independent； individual character； though traits like those in her author were attractive。 The constant effort to relieve the sense of this affords him the most admirable openings for the display of his exquisite style； of which he seldom or never fails to make the very most in this regard； but the necessity laid upon him to aim at securing a sense of relief by this is precisely the same as led him to write the overfine speeches in the plays； as Mr Pinero found and pointed out at Edinburgh： both defeat the true end； but in the written book mere art of style and a naivete and a certain sweetness of temper conceal the lack of nature and creative spontaneity； while on the stage the descriptions； saving reflections and fine asides； are ruthlessly cut away under sheer stage necessities； or； if left； but hinder the action； and art of this kind does not there suffice to conceal the lack of nature。
More clearly to bring out my meaning here and draw aid from comparative illustration； let me take my old friend of many years； Charles Gibbon。 Gibbon was poor； very poor； in intellectual subtlety compared with Stevenson； he had none of his sweet； quaint； original fancy； he was no casuist； he was utterly void of power in the subdued humorous twinkle or genial by…play in which Stevenson excelled。 But he has more of dramatic power； pure and simple； than Stevenson had … his novels … the best of them … would far more easily yield themselves to the ordinary purposes of the ordinary playwright。 Along with conscientiousness； perception； penetration； with the dramatist must go a certain indescribable common…sense commonplaceness … if I may name it so … protection against vagary and that over…refined egotism and self…confession which is inimical to the drama and in which the Stevensonian type all too largely abounds for successful dramatic production。 Mr Henley perhaps put it too strongly when he said that what was supremely of interest to R。 L。 Stevenson was Stevenson himself； but he indicates the tendency； and that tendency is inimical to strong； broad； effective and varied dramatic presentation。 Water cannot rise above its own level； nor can minds of this type go freely out of themselves in a grandly healthy； unconscious； and unaffected way； and this is the secret of the dramatic spirit； if it be not； as Shelley said； the secret of morals； which Stevenson； when he passed away； was but on the way to attain。 As we shall see； he had risen so far above it； subdued it； triumphed over it； that we really cannot guess what he might have attained had but more years been given him。 For the last attainment of the loftiest and truest genius is precisely this … to gain such insight of the real that all else becomes subsidiary。 True simplicity and the abiding relief and enduring power of true art with all classes lies here and not elsewhere。 Cleverness； refinement； fancy； and invention； even sublety of intellect； are practically nowhere in this sphere without this。
CHAPTER XIV … STEVENSON AS DRAMATIST
IN opposition to Mr Pinero； therefore； I assert that Stevenson's defect in spontaneous dramatic presentation is seen clearly in his novels as well as in his plays proper。
In writing to my good friend； Mr Thomas M'Kie； Advocate； Edinburgh； telling him of my work on R。 L。 Stevenson and the results； I thus gathered up in little the broad reflections on this point； and I may perhaps be excused quoting the following passages； as they reinforce by a new reference or illustration or two what has just been said：
〃Considering his great keenness and force on some sides； I find R。 L。 Stevenson markedly deficient in grip on other sides … common sides； after all； of human nature。 This was so far largely due to a dreamy； mystical； so far perverted and； so to say； often even inverted casuistical； fatalisti
