wealbk05-第14部分
按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页,按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页,按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部!
————未阅读完?加入书签已便下次继续阅读!
acquired by private adventurers; and without it there seems to be
no possibility of trading to Hudson's Bay。 The moderate capital
of the company; which; it is said; does not exceed one hundred
and ten thousand pounds; may besides be sufficient to enable them
to engross the whole; or almost the whole; trade and surplus
produce of the miserable; though extensive country; comprehended
within their charter。 No private adventurers; accordingly; have
ever attempted to trade to that country in competition with them。
This company; therefore; have always enjoyed an exclusive trade
in fact; though they may have no right to it in law。 Over and
above all this; the moderate capital of this company is said to
be divided among a very small number of proprietors。 But a joint
stock company; consisting of a small number of proprietors; with
a moderate capital; approaches very nearly to the nature of a
private copartnery; and may be capable of nearly the same degree
of vigilance and attention。 It is not to be wondered at;
therefore; if; in consequence of these different advantages; the
Hudson's Bay Company had; before the late war; been able to carry
on their trade with a considerable degree of success。 It does not
seem probable; however; that their profits ever approached to
what the late Mr。 Dobbs imagined them。 A much more sober and
judicious writer; Mr。 Anderson; author of The Historical and
Chronological Deduction of Commerce; very justly observes that;
upon examining the accounts of which Mr。 Dobbs himself was given
for several years together of their exports and imports; and upon
making proper allowances for their extraordinary risk and
expense; it does not appear that their profits deserve to be
envied; or that they can much; if at all; exceed the ordinary
profits of trade。
The South Sea Company never had any forts or garrisons to
maintain; and therefore were entirely exempted from one great
expense to which other joint stock companies for foreign trade
are subject。 But they had an immense capital divided among an
immense number of proprietors。 It was naturally to be expected;
therefore; that folly; negligence; and profusion should prevail
in the whole management of their affairs。 The knavery and
extravagance of their stock…jobbing projects are sufficiently
known; and the explication of them would be foreign to the
present subject。 Their mercantile projects were not much better
conducted。 The first trade which they engaged in was that of
supplying the Spanish West Indies with negroes; of which (in
consequence of what was called the Assiento contract granted them
by the Treaty of Utrecht) they had the exclusive privilege。 But
as it was not expected that much profit could be made by this
trade; both the Portuguese and French companies; who had enjoyed
it upon the same terms before them; having been ruined by it;
they were allowed; as compensation; to send annually a ship of a
certain burden to trade directly to the Spanish West Indies。 Of
the ten voyages which this annual ship was allowed to make; they
are said to have gained considerably by one; that of the Royal
Caroline in 1731; and to have been losers; more or less; by
almost all the rest。 Their ill success was imputed; by their
factors and agents; to the extortion and oppression of the
Spanish government; but was; perhaps; principally owing to the
profusion and depredations of those very factors and agents; some
of whom are said to have acquired great fortunes even in one
year。 In 1734; the company petitioned the king that they might be
allowed to dispose of the trade and tonnage of their annual ship;
on account of the little profit which they made by it; and to
accept such equivalent as they could obtain from the of Spain。
In 1724; this company had undertaken the whale…fishery。 Of
this; indeed; they had no monopoly; but as long as they carried
it on; no other British subjects appear to have engaged in it。 Of
the eight voyages which their ships made to Greenland; they were
gainers by one; and losers by all the rest。 After their eighth
and last voyage; when they had sold their ships; stores; and
utensils; they found that their whole loss; upon this branch;
capital and interest included; amounted to upwards of two hundred
and thirty…seven thousand pounds。
In 1722; this company petitioned the Parliament to be
allowed to divide their immense capital of more than thirty…three
millions eight hundred thousand pounds; the whole of which had
been lent to government; into two equal parts: The one half; or
upwards of sixteen millions nine hundred thousand pounds; to be
put upon the same footing with other government annuities; and
not to be subject to the debts contracted; or losses incurred; by
the directors of the company in the prosecution of their
mercantile projects; the other half to remain; as before; a
trading stock; and to be subject to those debts and losses。 The
petition was too reasonable not to be granted。 In 1733; they
again petitioned the Parliament that three…fourths of their
trading stock might be turned into annuity stock; and only
one…fourth remain as trading stock; or exposed to the hazards
arising from the bad management of their directors。 Both their
annuity and trading stocks had; by this time; been reduced more
than two millions each by several different payments from
government; so that this fourth amounted only to L3;662;784 8s。
6d。 In 1748; all the demands of the company upon the King of
Spain; in consequence of the Assiento contract; were; by the
Treaty of Aix…la…Chapelle; given up for what was supposed an
equivalent。 An end was put to their trade with the Spanish West
Indies; the remainder of their trading stock was turned into an
annuity stock; and the company ceased in every respect to be a
trading company。
It ought to be observed that in the trade which the South
Sea Company carried on by means of their annual ship; the only
trade by which it ever was expected that they could make any
considerable profit; they were not without competitors; either in
the foreign or in the home market。 At Carthagena; Porto Bello;
and La Vera Cruz; they had to encounter the competition of the
Spanish merchants; who brought from Cadiz; to those markets;
European goods of the same kind with the outward cargo of their
ship; and in England they had to encounter that of the English
merchants; who imported from Cadiz goods of the Spanish West
Indies of the same kind with the inward cargo。 The goods both of
the Spanish and English merchants; indeed; were; perhaps; subject
to higher duties。 But the loss occasioned by the negligence;
profusion; and malversation of the servants of the company had
probably been a tax much heavier than all those duties。 That a
joint stock company should be able to carry on successfully any
branch of foreign trade; when private adventurers can come into
any sort of open and fair competition with them; seems contrary
to all experience。
The old English East India Company was established in 1600
by a charter from Queen Elizabeth。 In the first twelve voyages
which they fitted out for India; they appear to have traded as a
regulated company; with separate stocks; though only in the
general ships of the company。 In 1612; they united into a joint
stock。 Their charter was exclusive; and though not confirmed by
Act of Parliament; was in those days supposed to convey a real
exclusive privilege。 For many years; therefore; they were not
much disturbed by interlopers。 Their capital; which never
exceeded seven hundred and forty…four thousand pounds; and of
which fifty pounds was a share; was not so exorbitant; nor their
dealings so extensive; as to afford either a pretext for gross
negligence and profusion; or a cover to gross malversation。
Notwithstanding some extraordinary losses; occasioned partly by
the malice of the Dutch East India Company; and partly by other
accidents; they carried on for many years a successful trade。 But
in process of time; when the principles of liberty were better
understood; it became every day more and more doubtful how far a
Royal Charter; not confirmed by Act of Parliament; could convey
an exclusive privilege。 Upon this question the decisions of the
courts of justice were not uniform; but varied with the authority
of government and the humours of the times。 Interlopers
multiplied upon them; and towards the end of the reign of Charles
II; through the whole of that of James II and during a part of
that of William III; reduced them to great distress。 In 1698; a
proposal was made to Parliament of advancing two millions to
government at eight per cent; provided the subscribers were
erected into a new East India Company with exclusive privileges。
The old East India Company offered seven hundred thousand pounds;
nearly the amount of their capital; at four per cent upon the
same conditions。 But such was at that time the state of public
credit; that it was more convenient for government to borrow two
millions at eight per cent than seven hundred thousand pounds at
four。 The proposal of the new subscribers was accepted; and a new
East India Company established in consequence。 The old East India
Company; however; had a right to continue their trade till 1701。
They had; at the same time; in the name of their treasurer;
subscribed; very artfully; three hundred and fifteen thousand
pounds into the stock of the new。 By a negligence in the
expression of the Act of Parliament which vested the East India
trade in the subscribers to this loan of two millions; it did not
appear evident that they were all obliged to unite into a joint
stock。 A few private traders; whose subscriptions amounted only
to seven thousand two hundred pounds; insisted upon the privilege
of trading separately upon their own stocks and at their own
risk。 The old East India Company had a right to a separate trade