the higher learning in america-及7何蛍
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
nor is it found in practice to further the work of the sciences。
The schools in question do not in any peculiar degree draw on the
work of the scientists attached to their particular university��
nor do these scientists�察�on the other hand�察�have any special use
for the work of their associated technical schools。 In either
case the source drawn on is the general literature of the
subject�察�the body of materials available at large�察�not the work
of particular men attached to particular schools。 The
generalizations of science are indispensable to the technical
men�察�but what they draw on is the body of science at large��
regardless of what any given university establishment may have
had to do with the work out of which the particular items of
scientific information have emerged。 Nor is this scientific
material useful to the technologists for the further pursuit of
science�察�to them the scientific results are data�察�raw material to
be turned to practical use�察�not means by which to carry
scientific inquiry out to further results。
Similarly�察�the professions and the technical schools afford
valuable data for the use of the professed scholars and
scientists�察�information that serves as material of Investigation��
or that will at least be useful as a means of extending
correcting�察�verifying and correlating lines of inquiry on which
they are engaged。 But the further bearing of these facts upon the
affairs of life�察�their expediency or futility�察�is of no interest
or consequence。 The affairs of life�察�except the affairs of
learning�察�do not touch the interest of the university man as a
scholar or scientist。 What is of importance to him in all these
matters with which the professions and technologists are busy is
their bearing on those matters of fact into which his scientific
interest leads him to inquire。 The tests and experiments carried
out at these technical schools�察�as well as the experience
gathered by the members of their staff�察�will occasionally afford
him material for further inquiry or means whereby to check
results already arrived at�察�but for such material he does not by
preference resort to any one of the technical schools as
contrasted with any other�察�and it is quite an idle question
whether the source of any such serviceable information is a
school attached to his own university。 The investigator finds his
material where he can�察�which comes to saying that he draws on the
general body of technical knowledge�察�with no afterthought as to
what particular technical school may have stood in some relation
or other to the information which he finds useful。
Neither to the man engaged in university work nor to the
technical schools that may serve him as occasional sources of
material is there any advantage to be derived from their
inclusion in the university establishment。 Indeed�察�it is a
detriment to both parties�察�as has already been remarked�察�but more
decidedly to the university men。 By including the technical and
professional schools in the university corporation the
technologists and professional men attached to these schools are
necessarily included among the academic staff�察�and so they come
to take their part in the direction of academic affairs at large。
In what they so do toward shaping the academic policy they will
not only count for all they are worth�察�but they are likely to
count for something more than their due share in this respect��
for they are to some extent trained to the conduct of affairs��
and so come in for something of that deference that is currently
paid to men of affairs�察�at the same time that this practical
training gives them an advantage over their purely academic
colleagues�察�in the greater assurance and adroitness with which
they are able to present their contentions。 By virtue of this
same training�察�as well as by force of current practical interest��
the technologist and the professional man are�察�like other men of
affairs�察�necessarily and habitually impatient of any scientific
or scholarly work that does not obviously lend itself to some
practical use。 The technologist appreciates what is mechanically
serviceable�察�the professional man�察�as�察�for instance�察�the lawyer��
appreciates what promises pecuniary gain�察�and the two unite with
the business´man at large in repudiating whatever does not look
directly to such a utilitarian outcome。 So that as members of the
academic staff these men are likely to count at their full weight
toward the diversion of the university's forces from
disinterested science and scholarship to such palpably
utilitarian ends。
But the active measures so taken by the academic authorities
at the instance of the schoolmasters and ;practical; men are by
no means the only line along which their presence in the academic
corporation affects the case。 Intimate association with these
;utilitarians; unavoidably has its corrupting effect on the
scientists and scholars�察�and induces in them also something of
the same bias toward ;practical; results in their work�察�so that
they no longer pursue the higher learning with undivided
interest�察�but with more or less of an eye to the utilitarian main
chance�察�whereby the advantages of specialization�察�which are the
reason for these schools�察�are lost�察�and the pride of the modern
community is wounded in its most sensitive spot the efficiency
of its specialists。
So also�察�on the other hand�察�the formal incorporation of these
technological and professional men in the academic body�察�with its
professedly single´minded interest in learning�察�has its effect on
their frame of mind。 They are�察�without intending it�察�placed in a
false position�察�which unavoidably leads them to court a specious
appearance of scholarship�察�and so to invest their technological
discipline with a degree of pedantry and sophistication�察�whereby
it is hoped to give these schools and their work some scientific
and scholarly prestige�察�and so lift it to that dignity that is
pressed to attach to a non´utilitarian pursuit of learning。
Doubtless this pursuit of scholarly prestige is commonly
successful�察�to the extent that it produces the desired conviction
of awe in the vulgar�察�who do not know the difference�察�but all
this make´believe scholarship�察�however successfully staged�察�is
not what these schools are designed for�察�or at least it is not
what is expected of them�察�nor is it what they can do best and
most efficiently。
To the substantial gain of both parties�察�though with some
lesion of the vanity of both�察�the separation between the
university and the professional and technical schools should be
carried through and made absolute。 Only on such conditions can
either the one or the other do its own work in a workmanlike
manner。 Within the university precincts any aim or interest other
than those of irresponsible science and scholarship pursuit of
matter´of´fact knowledge are to be rated as interlopers。
IV
To all this there is the ready objection of the schoolmasters
and utilitarians that such a project is fantastic and
unpractical�察�useless and undesirable�察�that such has not been the
mission of the university in the past�察�nor its accepted place and
use in the educational system of today and yesterday�察� that the
universities of Christendom have from their first foundation been
occupied with professional training and useful knowledge�察�that
they have been founded for utilitarian purposes and their work
has been guided mainly or altogether by utilitarian
considerations�察 �all of which is conceded without argument。 The
historical argument amounts to saying that the universities were
founded before modern civilization took on its modern character��
before the disinterested pursuit of knowledge had come to take
the first place among the ideals of civilized mankind�察�and that
they were established to take care of those interests which were
then accounted of first importance�察�and that this intellectual
enterprise in pursuit of disinterested knowledge consequently was
not at that time confided to the care of any special
establishment or freely avowed as a legitimate interest in its
own right。
It is true that�察�by historical accident�察�the university at
large has grown out of professional training´schools�察�primarily
schools for training in theology�察�secondarily in law and
medicine。 It is also true�察�in like wise and in like degree�察�that
modern science and scholarship have grown out of the technology
of handicraft and the theological philosophy of the
schoolmen。��7*�� But just as it would be a bootless enterprise to
cut modern science back into handicraft technology�察�so would it
be a gratuitous imbecility to prune back the modern university to
that inchoate phase of its life´history and make it again a
corporation for the training of theologians�察�jurists and doctors
of medicine。 The historical argument does not enjoin a return to
the beginning of things�察�but rather an intelligent appreciation
of what things are coming to。
The genesis of the university at large�察�taken as an
institution of civilized life�察�is an incident of the transition
from the barbarian culture of the middle ages to modern times��
and its later growth and acquirement of character is an incident
of the further growth of modern civilization�察�and the character
of