the canadian dominion-µÚ5²¿·Ö
°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡û »ò ¡ú ¿É¿ìËÙÉÏÏ·ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉ쵀 Enter ¼ü¿É»Øµ½±¾ÊéĿ¼ҳ£¬°´¼üÅÌÉÏ·½Ïò¼ü ¡ü ¿É»Øµ½±¾Ò³¶¥²¿£¡
¡ª¡ª¡ª¡ªÎ´ÔĶÁÍꣿ¼ÓÈëÊéÇ©ÒѱãÏ´μÌÐøÔĶÁ£¡
ld¡¡be¡¡counted¡¡on¡¡in¡¡the¡¡last¡¡resort¡£
For¡¡a¡¡time¡¡the¡¡installment¡¡of¡¡self¡government¡¡thus¡¡granted¡¡satisfied¡¡the¡¡people¡£¡¡The¡¡pioneer¡¡years¡¡left¡¡little¡¡leisure¡¡for¡¡political¡¡discussion£»¡¡nor¡¡were¡¡there¡¡at¡¡first¡¡any¡¡general¡¡issues¡¡about¡¡which¡¡men¡¡might¡¡differ¡£¡¡The¡¡Government¡¡was¡¡carrying¡¡on¡¡acceptably¡¡the¡¡essential¡¡tasks¡¡of¡¡surveying£»¡¡land¡¡granting£»¡¡and¡¡road¡¡building£»¡¡and¡¡each¡¡member¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Assembly¡¡played¡¡his¡¡own¡¡hand¡¡and¡¡was¡¡chiefly¡¡concerned¡¡in¡¡obtaining¡¡for¡¡his¡¡constituents¡¡the¡¡roads¡¡and¡¡bridges£»¡¡they¡¡needed¡¡so¡¡badly¡£¡¡The¡¡English¡speaking¡¡settlers¡¡of¡¡Upper¡¡Canada¡¡were¡¡too¡¡widely¡¡scattered£»¡¡and¡¡the¡¡French¡speaking¡¡citizens¡¡of¡¡Lower¡¡Canada¡¡were¡¡too¡¡ignorant¡¡of¡¡representative¡¡institutions£»¡¡to¡¡act¡¡in¡¡groups¡¡or¡¡parties¡£
Much¡¡turned¡¡in¡¡these¡¡early¡¡years¡¡upon¡¡the¡¡personality¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Governor¡£¡¡In¡¡several¡¡instances£»¡¡the¡¡choice¡¡of¡¡rulers¡¡for¡¡the¡¡new¡¡provinces¡¡proved¡¡fortunate¡£¡¡This¡¡was¡¡particularly¡¡so¡¡in¡¡the¡¡case¡¡of¡¡John¡¡Graves¡¡Simcoe£»¡¡Lieutenant¡¡Governor¡¡of¡¡Upper¡¡Canada¡¡from¡¡1792¡¡to¡¡1799¡£¡¡He¡¡was¡¡a¡¡good¡¡soldier¡¡and¡¡a¡¡just¡¡and¡¡vigorous¡¡administrator£»¡¡particularly¡¡wise¡¡in¡¡setting¡¡his¡¡regulars¡¡to¡¡work¡¡building¡¡roads¡¡such¡¡as¡¡Yonge¡¡Street¡¡and¡¡Dundas¡¡Street£»¡¡which¡¡to¡¡this¡¡day¡¡are¡¡great¡¡provincial¡¡arteries¡¡of¡¡travel¡£¡¡Yet¡¡there¡¡were¡¡many¡¡sources¡¡of¡¡weakness¡¡in¡¡the¡¡scheme¡¡of¡¡governmentdivided¡¡authority£»¡¡absenteeism£»¡¡personal¡¡unfitness¡£¡¡When¡¡Dorchester¡¡was¡¡reappointed¡¡in¡¡1786£»¡¡he¡¡had¡¡been¡¡made¡¡Governor¡¡in¡¡Chief¡¡of¡¡all¡¡British¡¡North¡¡America¡£¡¡From¡¡the¡¡beginning£»¡¡however£»¡¡the¡¡Lieutenant¡¡Governors¡¡of¡¡the¡¡various¡¡provinces¡¡asserted¡¡independent¡¡authority£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡a¡¡few¡¡years¡¡the¡¡Governor¡¡General¡¡became¡¡in¡¡fact¡¡merely¡¡the¡¡Governor¡¡of¡¡the¡¡most¡¡populous¡¡province£»¡¡Lower¡¡Canada£»¡¡in¡¡which¡¡he¡¡resided¡£
In¡¡Upper¡¡Canada£»¡¡as¡¡in¡¡New¡¡Brunswick£»¡¡the¡¡population¡¡was¡¡at¡¡first¡¡much¡¡at¡¡one¡£¡¡In¡¡time£»¡¡however£»¡¡discordant¡¡elements¡¡appeared¡£¡¡Religious£»¡¡or¡¡at¡¡least¡¡denominational£»¡¡differences¡¡began¡¡to¡¡cause¡¡friction¡£¡¡The¡¡great¡¡majority¡¡of¡¡the¡¡early¡¡settlers¡¡in¡¡Upper¡¡Canada¡¡belonged¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Church¡¡of¡¡England£»¡¡whose¡¡adherents¡¡in¡¡the¡¡older¡¡colonies¡¡had¡¡nearly¡¡all¡¡taken¡¡the¡¡Loyalist¡¡side¡£¡¡Of¡¡the¡¡Ulster¡¡Presbyterians¡¡and¡¡New¡¡England¡¡Congregationalists¡¡who¡¡formed¡¡the¡¡backbone¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Revolution£»¡¡few¡¡came¡¡to¡¡Canada¡£¡¡The¡¡growth¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Methodists¡¡and¡¡Baptists¡¡in¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States¡¡after¡¡the¡¡Revolution£»¡¡however£»¡¡made¡¡its¡¡mark¡¡on¡¡the¡¡neighboring¡¡country¡£¡¡The¡¡first¡¡Methodist¡¡class¡¡meetings¡¡in¡¡Upper¡¡Canada£»¡¡held¡¡in¡¡the¡¡United¡¡Empire¡¡Loyalist¡¡settlement¡¡on¡¡the¡¡Bay¡¡of¡¡Quinte¡¡in¡¡1791£»¡¡were¡¡organized¡¡by¡¡itinerant¡¡preachers¡¡from¡¡the¡¡United¡¡States£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡the¡¡western¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡province¡¡pioneer¡¡Baptist¡¡evangelists¡¡from¡¡the¡¡same¡¡country¡¡reached¡¡the¡¡scattered¡¡settlers¡¡neglected¡¡by¡¡the¡¡older¡¡churches¡£
Nor¡¡was¡¡it¡¡in¡¡religion¡¡alone¡¡that¡¡diversity¡¡grew¡£¡¡Simcoe¡¡had¡¡set¡¡up¡¡a¡¡generous¡¡land¡¡policy¡¡which¡¡brought¡¡in¡¡many¡¡¡¨late¡¡Loyalists£»¡¨¡¡American¡¡settlers¡¡whose¡¡devotion¡¡to¡¡monarchical¡¡principles¡¡would¡¡not¡¡always¡¡bear¡¡close¡¡inquiry¡£¡¡The¡¡fantastic¡¡experiment¡¡of¡¡planting¡¡in¡¡the¡¡heart¡¡of¡¡the¡¡woods¡¡of¡¡Upper¡¡Canada¡¡a¡¡group¡¡of¡¡French¡¡nobles¡¡driven¡¡out¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Revolution¡¡left¡¡no¡¡trace£»¡¡but¡¡Mennonites£»¡¡Quakers£»¡¡and¡¡Scottish¡¡Highlanders¡¡contributed¡¡diverse¡¡and¡¡permanent¡¡factors¡¡to¡¡the¡¡life¡¡of¡¡the¡¡province¡£¡¡Colonel¡¡Thomas¡¡Talbot¡¡of¡¡Malahide£»¡¡¡¨a¡¡fierce¡¡little¡¡Irishman¡¡who¡¡hated¡¡Scotchmen¡¡and¡¡women£»¡¡turned¡¡teetotallers¡¡out¡¡of¡¡his¡¡house£»¡¡and¡¡built¡¡the¡¡only¡¡good¡¡road¡¡in¡¡the¡¡province£»¡¨¡¡made¡¡the¡¡beginnings¡¡of¡¡settlement¡¡midway¡¡on¡¡Lake¡¡Erie¡£¡¡A¡¡shrewd¡¡Massachusetts¡¡merchant£»¡¡Philemon¡¡Wright£»¡¡with¡¡his¡¡comrades£»¡¡their¡¡families£»¡¡servants£»¡¡horses£»¡¡oxen£»¡¡and¡¡10£»000¡¡pounds£»¡¡sledded¡¡from¡¡Boston¡¡to¡¡Montreal¡¡in¡¡the¡¡winter¡¡of¡¡1800£»¡¡and¡¡thence¡¡a¡¡hundred¡¡miles¡¡beyond£»¡¡to¡¡found¡¡the¡¡town¡¡of¡¡Hull¡¡and¡¡establish¡¡a¡¡great¡¡lumbering¡¡industry¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Ottawa¡¡Valley¡£
These¡¡differences¡¡of¡¡origin¡¡and¡¡ways¡¡of¡¡thought¡¡had¡¡not¡¡yet¡¡been¡¡reflected¡¡in¡¡political¡¡life¡£¡¡Party¡¡strife¡¡in¡¡Upper¡¡Canada¡¡began¡¡with¡¡a¡¡factional¡¡fight¡¡which¡¡took¡¡place¡¡in¡¡1805¡07¡¡between¡¡a¡¡group¡¡of¡¡Irish¡¡officeholders¡¡and¡¡a¡¡Scotch¡¡clique¡¡who¡¡held¡¡the¡¡reins¡¡of¡¡government¡£¡¡Weekes£»¡¡an¡¡Irish¡American¡¡barrister£»¡¡Thorpe£»¡¡a¡¡puisne¡¡judge£»¡¡Wyatt£»¡¡the¡¡surveyor¡¡general£»¡¡and¡¡Willcocks£»¡¡a¡¡United¡¡Irishman¡¡who¡¡had¡¡become¡¡sheriff¡¡of¡¡one¡¡of¡¡the¡¡four¡¡Upper¡¡Canada¡¡districts£»¡¡began¡¡to¡¡question¡¡the¡¡right¡¡to¡¡rule¡¡of¡¡¡¨the¡¡Scotch¡¡pedlars¡¨¡¡or¡¡¡¨the¡¡Shopkeeper¡¡Aristocracy£»¡¨¡¡as¡¡Thorpe¡¡called¡¡those¡¡merchants¡¡who£»¡¡for¡¡the¡¡lack¡¡of¡¡other¡¡leaders£»¡¡had¡¡developed¡¡an¡¡influence¡¡with¡¡the¡¡governors¡¡or¡¡ruled¡¡in¡¡their¡¡frequent¡¡absence¡£¡¡But¡¡the¡¡insurgents¡¡were¡¡backed¡¡by¡¡only¡¡a¡¡small¡¡minority¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Assembly£»¡¡and¡¡when¡¡the¡¡four¡¡leaders¡¡disappeared¡¡from¡¡the¡¡stage£»*¡¡this¡¡curtain¡¡raiser¡¡to¡¡the¡¡serious¡¡political¡¡drama¡¡which¡¡was¡¡to¡¡follow¡¡came¡¡quickly¡¡to¡¡its¡¡end¡£
*¡¡Weekes¡¡was¡¡slain¡¡in¡¡a¡¡duel¡£¡¡Wyatt¡¡and¡¡Thorpe¡¡were¡¡suspended¡¡by¡¡the¡¡Lieutenant¡¡Governor£»¡¡Sir¡¡Francis¡¡Gore£»¡¡only¡¡to¡¡win¡¡redress¡¡later¡¡in¡¡England¡£¡¡Willcocks¡¡was¡¡dismissed¡¡from¡¡office¡¡and¡¡fell¡¡fighting¡¡on¡¡the¡¡American¡¡side¡¡in¡¡the¡¡War¡¡of¡¡1812¡£
In¡¡Lower¡¡Canada¡¡the¡¡clash¡¡was¡¡more¡¡serious¡£¡¡The¡¡French¡¡Canadians£»¡¡who¡¡had¡¡not¡¡asked¡¡for¡¡representative¡¡government£»¡¡eventually¡¡grasped¡¡its¡¡possibilities¡¡and¡¡found¡¡leaders¡¡other¡¡than¡¡those¡¡ordained¡¡for¡¡them¡£¡¡In¡¡the¡¡first¡¡Assembly¡¡there¡¡were¡¡many¡¡seigneurs¡¡and¡¡aristocrats¡¡who¡¡bore¡¡names¡¡notable¡¡for¡¡six¡¡generations¡¡back¡¡Taschereau£»¡¡Duchesnay£»¡¡Lotbiniere£»¡¡Rouville£»¡¡Salaberry¡£¡¡But¡¡they¡¡soon¡¡found¡¡their¡¡surroundings¡¡uncongenial¡¡or¡¡failed¡¡to¡¡be¡¡reelected¡£¡¡Writing¡¡in¡¡1810¡¡to¡¡Lord¡¡Liverpool£»¡¡Secretary¡¡of¡¡State¡¡for¡¡War¡¡and¡¡the¡¡Colonies£»¡¡the¡¡Governor£»¡¡Sir¡¡James¡¡Craig£»¡¡with¡¡a¡¡fine¡¡patrician¡¡scorn¡¡thus¡¡pictures¡¡the¡¡Assembly¡¡of¡¡his¡¡day¡£
¡¨It¡¡really£»¡¡my¡¡Lord£»¡¡appears¡¡to¡¡me¡¡an¡¡absurdity£»¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Interests¡¡of¡¡certainly¡¡not¡¡an¡¡unimportant¡¡Colony£»¡¡involving¡¡in¡¡them¡¡those¡¡also¡¡of¡¡no¡¡inconsiderable¡¡portion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Commercial¡¡concerns¡¡of¡¡the¡¡British¡¡Empire£»¡¡should¡¡be¡¡in¡¡the¡¡hands¡¡of¡¡six¡¡petty¡¡shopkeepers£»¡¡a¡¡Blacksmith£»¡¡a¡¡Miller£»¡¡and¡¡15¡¡ignorant¡¡peasants¡¡who¡¡form¡¡part¡¡of¡¡our¡¡present¡¡House£»¡¡a¡¡Doctor¡¡or¡¡Apothecary£»¡¡twelve¡¡Canadian¡¡Avocats¡¡and¡¡Notaries£»¡¡and¡¡four¡¡so¡¡far¡¡respectable¡¡people¡¡that¡¡at¡¡least¡¡they¡¡do¡¡not¡¡keep¡¡shops£»¡¡together¡¡with¡¡ten¡¡English¡¡members¡¡compleat¡¡the¡¡List£º¡¡there¡¡is¡¡not¡¡one¡¡person¡¡coming¡¡under¡¡the¡¡description¡¡of¡¡a¡¡Canadian¡¡Gentleman¡¡among¡¡them¡£¡¨
And¡¡again£º
¡¨A¡¡Governor¡¡cannot¡¡obtain¡¡among¡¡them¡¡even¡¡that¡¡sort¡¡of¡¡influence¡¡that¡¡might¡¡arise¡¡from¡¡personal¡¡intercourse¡£¡¡I¡¡can¡¡have¡¡none¡¡with¡¡Blacksmiths£»¡¡Millers£»¡¡and¡¡Shopkeepers£»¡¡even¡¡the¡¡Avocats¡¡and¡¡Notaries¡¡who¡¡compose¡¡so¡¡considerable¡¡a¡¡portion¡¡of¡¡the¡¡House£»¡¡are£»¡¡generally¡¡speaking£»¡¡such¡¡as¡¡I¡¡can¡¡nowhere¡¡meet£»¡¡except¡¡during¡¡the¡¡actual¡¡sitting¡¡of¡¡Parliament£»¡¡when¡¡I¡¡have¡¡a¡¡day¡¡of¡¡the¡¡week¡¡expressly¡¡appropriated¡¡to¡¡the¡¡receiving¡¡a¡¡large¡¡portion¡¡of¡¡them¡¡at¡¡dinner¡£¡¨
Leadership¡¡under¡¡these¡¡conditions¡¡fell¡¡to¡¡the¡¡¡¨unprincipled¡¡Demagogues£»¡¨¡¡half¡educated¡¡lawyers£»¡¡men¡¡¡¨with¡¡nothing¡¡to¡¡lose¡£¡¨
But¡¡it¡¡was¡¡not¡¡merely¡¡as¡¡an¡¡aristocrat¡¡facing¡¡peasants¡¡and¡¡shopkeepers£»¡¡nor¡¡as¡¡a¡¡soldier¡¡faced¡¡by¡¡talkers£»¡¡but¡¡as¡¡an¡¡Englishman¡¡on¡¡guard¡¡against¡¡Frenchmen¡¡that¡¡Craig¡¡found¡¡himself¡¡at¡¡odds¡¡with¡¡his¡¡Assembly¡£¡¡For¡¡nearly¡¡twenty¡¡years¡¡in¡¡this¡¡period¡¡England¡¡was¡¡at¡¡death¡¡grips¡¡with¡¡France£»¡¡end¡¡to¡¡hate¡¡and¡¡despise¡¡all¡¡Frenchmen¡¡was¡¡part¡¡of¡¡the¡¡hereditary¡¡and¡¡congenial¡¡duty¡¡of¡¡all¡¡true¡¡Britons¡£¡¡Craig¡¡and¡¡those¡¡who¡¡counseled¡¡him¡¡were¡¡firmly¡¡convinced¡¡that¡¡the¡¡new¡¡subjects¡¡were¡¡French¡¡at¡¡heart¡£¡¡Of¡¡the¡¡250£»000¡¡inhabitants¡¡of¡¡Lower¡¡Canada£»¡¡he¡¡declared£»¡¡¡¨about¡¡20£»000¡¡or¡¡25£»000¡¡may¡¡be¡¡English¡¡or¡¡Americans£»¡¡the¡¡rest¡¡are¡¡French¡£¡¡I¡¡use¡¡the¡¡term¡¡designedly£»¡¡my¡¡Lord£»¡¡because¡¡I¡¡mean¡¡to¡¡say¡¡that¡¡they¡¡are¡¡in¡¡Language£»¡¡in¡¡religion£»¡¡in¡¡manner¡¡and¡¡in¡¡attachment¡¡completely¡¡French¡£¡¨¡¡That¡¡there¡¡was¡¡still¡¡some¡¡affection¡¡for¡¡old¡¡France£»¡¡stirred¡¡by¡¡war¡¡and¡¡French¡¡victories£»¡¡there¡¡is¡¡no¡¡question£»¡¡but¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Canadians¡¡wished¡¡to¡¡return¡¡to¡¡French¡¡allegiance¡¡was¡¡untrue£»¡¡even¡¡though¡¡Craig¡¡reported¡¡that¡¡such¡¡was¡¡¡¨the¡¡general¡¡opinion¡¡of¡¡all¡¡ranks¡¡with¡¡whom¡¡it¡¡is¡¡possible¡¡to¡¡converse¡¡on¡¡the¡¡subject¡£¡¨¡¡The¡¡French¡¡Revolution¡¡had¡¡created¡¡a¡¡great¡¡gulf¡¡between¡¡Old¡¡France¡¡and¡¡New¡¡France¡£¡¡The¡¡clergy¡¡did¡¡their¡¡utmost¡¡to¡¡bar¡¡all¡¡intercourse¡¡with¡¡the¡¡land¡¡where¡¡deism¡¡and¡¡revolution¡¡held¡¡sway£»¡¡and¡¡when¡¡the¡¡Roman¡¡Catholic¡¡Church¡¡and¡¡the¡¡British¡¡Government¡¡combined¡¡for¡¡years¡¡on¡¡a¡¡single¡¡object£»¡¡it¡¡was¡¡little¡¡wonder¡¡they¡¡succeeded¡£¡¡Nelson's¡¡victory¡¡at¡¡Trafalgar¡¡was¡¡celebrated¡¡by¡¡a¡¡Te¡¡Deum¡¡in¡¡the¡¡Roman¡¡Catholic¡¡Cathedral¡¡at¡¡Quebec¡£¡¡In¡¡fact£»¡¡as¡¡Craig¡¡elsewhere¡¡noted£»¡¡the¡¡habitants¡¡were¡¡becoming¡¡rather¡¡a¡¡new¡¡and¡¡distinct¡¡nationality£»¡¡a¡¡nation¡¡canadienne¡£¡¡They¡¡ceased¡¡to¡¡be¡¡French£»¡¡they¡¡declined¡¡to¡¡become¡¡English£»¡¡and¡¡sheltered¡¡under¡¡their¡¡¡¨Sacred¡¡Charter¡¨*¡¡they¡¡became¡¡Canadians¡¡first¡¡and¡¡last¡£
*¡¡¡¨It¡¡cannot¡¡be¡¡sufficiently¡¡inculcated¡¡ON¡¡THE¡¡PART¡¡OF¡¡GOVERNMENT¡¡that¡¡the¡¡Quebec¡¡Act¡¡is¡¡a¡¡Sacred¡¡Charter£»¡¡granted¡¡by¡¡the¡¡King¡¡in¡¡Parliament¡¡to¡¡the¡¡Canadians¡¡as¡¡a¡¡Security¡¡for¡¡their¡¡Religion£»¡¡Laws£»¡¡and¡¡Property¡£¡¨¡¡Governor¡¡Sir¡¡Frederick¡¡Haldimand¡¡to¡¡Lord¡¡George¡¡Germaine£»¡¡Oct¡£¡¡25£»¡¡1780¡£
The¡¡governors¡¡were¡¡not¡¡alone¡¡in¡¡this¡¡hostility¡¡to¡¡the¡¡mass¡¡of¡¡the¡¡people¡£¡¡There¡¡had¡¡grown¡¡up¡¡in¡¡the¡¡colony¡¡a¡¡little¡¡clique¡¡of¡¡officeholders£»¡¡of¡¡whom¡¡Jonathan¡¡Sewell£»¡¡the¡¡Loyalist¡¡Attorney¡¡General£»¡¡and¡¡later¡¡Chief¡¡Justice£»¡¡was¡¡the¡¡chief£»¡¡full¡¡of¡¡racial¡¡and¡¡class¡¡prejudice£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡some¡¡cases¡¡greedy¡¡for¡¡personal¡¡gain¡£¡¡Sewell¡¡declared¡¡it¡¡¡¨indispensably¡¡necessary¡¡to¡¡overwhelm¡¡and¡¡sink¡¡the¡¡Canadian¡¡population¡¡by¡¡English¡¡Protestants£»¡¨¡¡and¡¡was¡¡even¡¡ready¡¡to¡¡run¡¡the¡¡risk¡¡of¡¡bringing¡¡in¡¡Americans¡¡to¡¡effect¡¡this¡¡end¡£¡¡Of¡¡the¡¡non¡official¡¡English£»¡¡some¡¡were¡¡strongly¡¡opposed¡¡to¡¡the¡¡pretensions¡¡of¡¡the¡¡¡¨Chateau¡¡Clique¡¨£»¡¡but¡¡others£»¡¡and¡¡especially¡¡the¡¡merchants£»¡¡with¡¡their¡¡organ¡¡the¡¡Quebec¡¡¡¨Mercury¡¨£»¡¡were¡¡loud¡¡in¡¡their¡¡denunciations¡¡of¡¡the¡¡French¡¡who¡¡were¡¡unprogressive¡¡and¡¡who¡¡as¡¡landowners¡¡were¡¡incidentally¡¡trying¡¡to¡¡throw¡¡the¡¡burden¡¡of¡¡taxation¡¡chiefly¡¡on¡¡the¡¡traders¡£
The¡¡first¡¡open¡¡sign¡¡of¡¡the¡¡racial¡¡division¡¡which¡¡was¡¡to¡¡bedevil¡¡the¡¡life¡¡of¡¡the¡¡province¡¡came¡¡in¡¡1806¡¡when£»¡¡in¡¡order¡¡to¡¡meet¡¡the¡¡attacks¡¡of¡¡the¡¡Anglicizing¡¡party£»¡¡the¡¡newspaper¡¡¡¨Le¡¡Canadien¡¨¡¡was¡¡established¡¡at¡¡Quebec¡£¡¡Its¡¡motto¡¡was¡¡significant£º¡¡¡¨Notre¡¡langue£»¡¡nos¡¡institutions£»¡¡et¡¡nos¡¡lois¡£¡¨¡¡Craig¡¡and¡¡his¡¡counselors¡¡took¡¡up¡¡the¡¡challenge¡£¡¡In¡¡1808¡¡he¡¡dismissed¡¡five¡¡militia¡¡officers£»¡¡because¡¡of¡¡their¡¡connection¡¡with¡¡the¡¡irritating¡¡journal£»¡¡and¡¡in¡¡1810¡¡he¡¡went¡¡so¡¡far¡¡as¡¡to¡¡suppress¡¡it¡¡and¡¡to¡¡throw¡¡into¡¡prison¡¡four¡¡of¡¡those¡¡responsible¡¡for¡¡its¡¡management¡£¡¡The¡¡Assembly£»¡¡which¡¡was¡¡proving¡¡hard¡¡to¡¡control£»¡¡was¡¡twice¡¡dissolved¡¡in¡¡three¡¡years