伊浪窮徨慕 > 将砿凪麿窮徨慕 > philosophy of history >

及19何蛍

philosophy of history-及19何蛍

弌傍�� philosophy of history 忖方�� 耽匈4000忖

梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��



morality being regarded in a subjective aspect and view�察�as founded on what the agent holds to be
right and wrong�察�good and evil�察�not on a principle which is considered to be in and for itself right
and good�察�or a crime and evil�察�or on a particular religion believed to be the true one。 

                                   ′ 74

We may fairly decline on this occasion the task of tracing the formalism and error of such a view��
and establishing the true principles of morality�察�or rather of social virtue in opposition to false
morality。 For the History of the World occupies a higher ground than that on which morality has
properly its position�察�which is personal character ! the conscience of individuals�察 � their particular
will and mode of action�察�these have a value�察�imputation�察�reward or�察�punishment proper to
themselves。 What the absolute aim of Spirit requires and accomplishes�察 � what Providence does��
! transcends the obligations�察�and the liability to imputation and the ascription of good or bad
motives�察�which attach to individuality in virtue of its social relations。 They who on moral grounds��
and consequently with noble intention�察�have resisted that which the advance of the Spiritual Idea
makes necessary�察�stand higher in moral worth than those whose crimes have been turned into the
means ! under the direction of a superior principle ! of realising the purposes of that principle。
But in such revolutions both parties generally stand within the limits of the same circle of transient
and corruptible existence。 Consequently it is only a formal rectitude ! deserted by the living Spirit
and by God ! which those who stand upon ancient right and order maintain。 The deeds of great
men�察�who are the Individuals of the World's History�察�thus appear not only justified in view of that
intrinsic result of which they were not conscious�察�but also from the point of view occupied by the
secular moralist。 But looked at from this point�察�moral claims that are irrelevant�察�must not be
brought into collision with world´historical deeds and their accomplishment。 The Litany of private
virtues ! modesty�察�humility�察�philanthropy and forbearance ! must not be raised against them。 The
History of the World might�察�on principle�察�entirely ignore the circle within which morality and the so
much talked of distinction between the moral and the politic lies ! not only in abstaining from
judgments�察�for the principles involved�察�and the necessary reference of the deeds in question to
those principles�察�are a sufficient judgment of them ! but in leaving Individuals quite out of view
and unmentioned。 What it has to record is the activity of the Spirit of Peoples�察�so that the
individual forms which that spirit has assumed in the sphere of outward reality�察�might be left to the
delineation of special histories。 

                                   ′ 75

The same kind of formalism avails itself in its peculiar manner of the indefiniteness attaching to
genius�察�poetry�察�and even philosophy�察�thinks equally that it finds these everywhere。 We have here
products of reflective thought�察�and it is familiarity with those general conceptions which single out
and name real distinctions without fathoming the true depth of the matter�察 � that we call Culture。 It
is something merely formal�察�inasmuch as it aims at nothing more than the analysis of the subject��
whatever it be�察�into its constituent parts�察�and the comprehension of these in their logical definitions
and forms。 It is not the free universality of conception necessary for making an abstract principle
the object of consciousness。 Such a consciousness of Thought itself�察�and of its forms isolated from
a particular object�察�is Philosophy。 This has�察�indeed�察�the condition of its existence in culture�察�that
condition being the taking up of the object of thought�察�and at the same time clothing it with the
form of universality�察�in such a way that the material content and the form given by the intellect are
held in an inseparable state�察 � inseparable to such a degree that the object in question ´which�察�by
the analysis of one conception into a multitude of conceptions�察�is enlarged to an incalculable
treasure of thought ! is regarded as a merely empirical datum in whose formation thought has bad
no share。 

                                   ′ 76

But it is quite as much an act of Thought ! of the Understanding in particular ! to embrace in one
simple conception object which of itself comprehends a concrete and large significance ��as Earth��
Man�察 �Alexander or Caesar�� and to designate it by one word�察 � as to resolve such a conception
! duly to isolate in idea the conceptions which it contains�察�and to give them particular names。 And
in reference to the view which gave occasion to what has just been said�察�thus much will be clear��
! that as reflection produces what we include under the general terms Genius�察�Talent�察�Art��
Science�察 � formal culture on every grade of intellectual development�察�not only can�察�but must grow��
and attain a mature bloom�察�while the grade in question is developing itself to a State�察�and on this
basis of civilisation is advancing to intelligent reflection and to general forms of thought�察 � as in
laws�察�so in regard to all else。 In the very association of men in a state�察�lies the necessity of formal
culture ! consequently of the rise of the sciences and of a cultivated poetry and art generally。 The
arts designated ^plastic�察院�require besides�察�even in their technical aspect�察�the civilised association
of men。 The poetic art ! which has less need of external requirements and means�察�and which has
the element of immediate existence�察�the voice�察�as its material ! steps forth with great boldness and
with matured expression�察�even under the conditions presented by a people not yet united in a
political combination�察�since�察�as remarked above�察�language attains on its own particular ground a
high intellectual development�察�prior to the commencement of civilisation。 

                                   ′ 77

Philosophy also must make its appearance where political life exists�察�since that in virtue of which
any series of phenomena is reduced within the sphere of culture�察�as above stated�察�is the Form
strictly proper to Thought�察�and thus for philosophy�察�which is nothing other than the consciousness
of this form itself ! the Thinking of Thinking�察� the material of which its edifice is to be constructed��
is already prepared by general culture。 If in the development of the State itself�察�periods are
necessitated which impel the soul of nobler natures to seek refuge from the Present in ideal
regions�察 � in order to find in them that harmony with itself which it can no longer enjoy in the
discordant real world�察�where the reflective intelligence attacks all that is holy and deep�察�which had
been spontaneously inwrought into the religion�察�laws and manners of nations�察�and brings them
down and attenuates them to abstract godless generalities�察 � Thought will be compelled to
become Thinking Reason�察�with the view of effecting in its own element�察�the restoration of its
principles from the ruin to which they had been brought。 

                                   ′ 78

We find then�察�it is true�察�among all world´historical peoples�察�poetry�察�plastic art�察�science�察�even
philosophy�察�but not only is there a diversity in style and bearing generally�察�but still more remarkably
in subject´matter�察�and this is a diversity of the most important kind�察�affecting the rationality of that
subject´matter。 It is useless for a pretentious aesthetic criticism to demand that our good pleasure
should not be made the rule for the matter ! the substantial part of their contents ! and to
maintain that it is the beautiful form as such�察�the grandeur of the fancy�察�and so forth�察�which fine art
aims at�察�and which must be considered and enjoyed by a liberal taste and cultivated mind。 A
healthy intellect does not tolerate such abstractions�察�and cannot assimilate productions of the kind
above referred to。 Granted that the Indian Epopees might be placed on a level with the Homeric��
on account of a number of those qualities of form ! grandeur of invention and imaginative power��
liveliness of images and emotions�察�and beauty of diction�察�yet the infinite difference of matter
remains�察�consequently one of substantial importance and involving the interest of Reason which is
immediately concerned with the consciousness of the Idea of Freedom�察�and its expression in
individuals。 There is not only a classical form�察�but a classical order of subject´matter�察�and in a
work of art form and subject´matter are so closely united that the former can only be classical to
the extent to which the latter is so。 With a fantastic�察�indeterminate material ! the Rule is the
essence of Reason ´the form becomes measureless and formless�察�or mean and contracted。 In the
same way�察�in that comparison of the various systems of philosophy of which we have already
spoken�察�the only point of importance is overlooked�察�namely the character of that Unity which is
found alike in the Chinese�察�the Eleatic�察�and the Spinozistic philosophy ! the distinction between
the recognition of that Unity as abstract and as concrete ! concrete to the extent of being a unity
in and by itself ! a unity synonymous with Spirit。 But that co´ordination proves that it recognises
only such an abstract unity�察�so that while it gives judgment respecting philosophy it is ignorant of
that very point which constitutes the interest of philosophy。 

                                   ′ 79

But there are also spheres which�察�amid all the variety that is presented in the substantial content of
a particular form of culture�察�remain the same。 The difference above mentioned in art�察�science��
philosophy�察�concerns the thinking Reason and Freedom�察�which is the self´consciousness of the
former�察�and which has the same one root with Thought。 As it is not the brute�察�but only the man that
thinks�察�he only ! and only because he is a thinking being ! has Freedom。 His consciousness
imports this�察�that the individual comprehends itself as a person�察�that is�察�recognises itself in its single
existence as possessing universality�察 � as capable of abstraction from�察�an

卦指朕村 貧匯匈 和匯匈 指欺競何 壘��1�� 家��0��

低辛嬬浪散議