the writings-2-及51何蛍
梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ○ 賜 ★ 辛酔堀貧和鍬匈��梓囚徒貧議 Enter 囚辛指欺云慕朕村匈��梓囚徒貧圭�鮗� ● 辛指欺云匈競何��
!!!!隆堋響頼��紗秘慕禰厮宴和肝写偬堋響��
an hour�察�be believed against those who have had such a favorable。
and well improved opportunity�拭 �They should not even qualify the
result。 Several men have given their opinion as to the distance
of the steamboat Carson�察�and I suppose if one should go and
measure that distance you would believe him in preference to all
of them。
;These measurements were made when the boat was not in the draw。
It has been ascertained what is the area of the cross section of
this stream and the area of the face of the piers�察�and the
engineers say that the piers being put there will increase the
current proportionally as the space is decreased。 So with the
boat in the draw。 The depth of the channel was twenty´two feet��
the width one hundred and sixteen feet�察�multiply these and you
have the square´feet across the water of the draw�察�viz。�此�2552
feet。 The Afton was 35 feet wide and drew 5 feet�察�making a
fourteenth of the sum。 Now�察�one´fourteenth of five miles is
five´fourteenths of one mileabout ��one third of a milethe
increase of the current。 We will call the current five and a
half miles per hour。 The next thing I will try to prove is that
the plaintiff's �┌殖� boat had power to run six miles an hour in
that current。 It had been testified that she was a strong�察�swift
boat�察�able to run eight miles an hour up stream in a current of
four miles an hour�察�and fifteen miles down stream。 Strike the
average and you will find what is her averageabout eleven and a
half miles。 Take the five and a half miles which is the speed of
the current in the draw and it leaves the power of that boat in
that draw at six miles an hour�察�528 feet per minute and 8 4/5
feet to the second。
; Next I propose to show that there are no cross currents。 I
know their witnesses say that there are cross currentsthat�察�as
one witness says�察�there were three cross currents and two eddies��
so far as mere statement�察�without experiment�察�and mingled with
mistakes�察�can go�察�they have proved。 But can these men's
testimony be compared with the nice�察�exact�察�thorough experiments
of our witnesses�拭 �Can you believe that these floats go across
the currents�拭 �It is inconceivable that they could not have
discovered every possible current。 How do boats find currents
that floats cannot discover�拭 �We assume the position then that
those cross currents are not there。 My next proposition is that
the Afton passed between the S。 B。 Carson and the Iowa shore。
That is undisputed。
;Next I shall show that she struck first the short pier�察�then the
long pier�察�then the short one again and there she stopped。;
Mr。 Lincoln then cited the testimony of eighteen witnesses on
this point。
;How did the boat strike when she went in�拭 �Here is an endless
variety of opinion。 But ten of them say what pier she struck��
three of them testify that she struck first the short�察�then the
long and then the short for the last time。 None of the rest
substantially contradict this。 I assume that these men have got
the truth because I believe it an established fact。 My next
proposition is that after she struck the short and long pier and
before she got back to the short pier the boat got right with her
bow up。 So says the pilot Parkerthat he got her through until
her starboard wheel passed the short pier。 This would make her
head about even with the head of the long pier。 He says her head
was as high or higher than the head of the long pier。 Other
witnesses confirmed this one。 The final stroke was in the splash
door aft the wheel。 Witnesses differ�察�but the majority say that
she struck thus。;
Court adjourned。
14th day�察�Wednesday�察�Sept。 23�察�1857。
Mr。 A。 LINCOLN resumed。 He said he should conclude as soon as
possible。 He said the colored map of the plaintiff which was
brought in during one stage of the trial showed itself that the
cross currents alleged did not exist。 That the current as
represented would drive an ascending boat to the long pier but
not to the short pier�察�as they urge。 He explained from a model
of a boat where the splash door is�察�just behind the wheel。 The
boat struck on the lower shoulder of the short pier as she swung
around in the splash door�察�then as she went on around she struck
the point or end of the pier�察�where she rested。 ;Her engineers�察�
said Mr。 Lincoln�察 �say the starboard wheel then was rushing
around rapidly。 Then the boat must have struck the upper point
of the pier so far back as not to disturb the wheel。 It is forty
feet from the stern of the Afton to the splash door�察�and thus it
appears that she had but forty feet to go to clear the pier。 How
was it that the Afton with all her power flanked over from the
channel to the short pier without moving one foot ahead�拭 �Suppose
she was in the middle of the draw�察�her wheel would have been 31
feet from the short pier。 The reason she went over thus is her
starboard wheel was not working。 I shall try to establish the
fact that the wheel was not running and that after she struck she
went ahead strong on this same wheel。 Upon the last point the
witnesses agree�察�that the starboard wheel was running after she
struck�察�and no witnesses say that it was running while she was
out in the draw flanking over。;
Mr。 Lincoln read from the testimonies of various witnesses to
prove that the starboard wheel was not working while the Afton
was out in the stream。
;Other witnesses show that the captain said something of the
machinery of the wheel�察�and the inference is that he knew the
wheel was not working。 The fact is undisputed that she did not
move one inch ahead while she was moving this 31 feet sideways。
There is evidence proving that the current there is only five
miles an hour�察�and the only explanation is that her power was not
all usedthat only one wheel was working。 The pilot says he
ordered the engineers to back her up。 The engineers differ from
him and said they kept on going ahead。 The bow was so swung that
the current pressed it over�察�the pilot pressed the stern over
with the rudder�察�though not so fast but that the bow gained on
it�察�and only one wheel being in motion the boat nearly stood
still so far as motion up and down is concerned�察�and thus she was
thrown upon this pier。 The Afton came into the draw after she
had just passed the Carson�察�and as the Carson no doubt kept the
true course the Afton going around her got out of the proper way��
got across the current into the eddy which is west of a straight
line drawn down from the long pier�察�was compelled to resort to
these changes of wheels�察�which she did not do with sufficient
adroitness to save her。 Was it not her own fault that she
entered wrong�察�so far wrong that she never got right�拭 �Is the
defence to blame for that��
;For several days we were entertained with depositions about
boats 'smelling a bar。' Why did the Afton then�察�after she had
come up smelling so close to the long pier sheer off so
strangely。 When she got to the centre of the very nose she was
smelling she seemed suddenly to have lost her sense of smell and
to have flanked over to the short pier。;
Mr。 Lincoln said there was no practicability in the project of
building a tunnel under the river�察�for there ;is not a tunnel
that is a successful project in this world。 A suspension bridge
cannot be built so high but that the chimneys of the boats will
grow up till they cannot pass。 The steamboat men will take pains
to make them grow。 The cars of a railroad cannot without immense
expense rise high enough to get even with a suspension bridge or
go low enough to get through a tunnel�察�such expense is
unreasonable。
;The plaintiffs have to establish that the bridge is a material
obstruction and that they have managed their boat with reasonable
care and skill。 As to the last point high winds have nothing to
do with it�察�for it was not a windy day。 They must show due skill
and care。 Difficulties going down stream will not do�察�for they
were going up stream。 Difficulties with barges in tow have
nothing to do with the accident�察�for they had no barge。 ;Mr。
Lincoln said he had much more to say�察�many things he could
suggest to the jury�察�but he wished to close to save time。
TO JESSE K。 DUBOIS。
DEAR DUBOIS��
BLOOMINGTON�察�Dec。 19�察�1857。
J。 M。 Douglas of the I。 C。 R。 R。 Co。 is here and will carry this
letter。 He says they have a large sum ��near 90��000�� which they
will pay into the treasury now�察�if they have an assurance that
they shall not be sued before Jan。�察�1859otherwise not。
I really wish you could consent to this。 Douglas says they
cannot pay more�察�and I believe him。
I do not write this as a lawyer seeking an advantage for a
client�察�but only as a friend�察�only urging you to do what I think
I would do if I were in your situation。 I mean this as private
and confidential only�察�but I feel a good deal of anxiety about
it。
Yours as ever��
A。 LINCOLN。
TO JOSEPH GILLESPIE。
SPRINGFIELD�察�Jan。 19�察�1858。
MY DEAR SIR��
This morning Col。 McClernand showed me a petition for a mandamus
against the Secretary of State to compel him to certify the
apportionment act of last session�察�and he says it will be
presented to the court to´morrow morning。 We shall be allowed
three or four days to get up a return�察�and I�察�for one�察�want the
benefit of consultation with you。
Please come right up。
Yours as ever��
A。 LINCOLN。
TO J。 GILLESPIE。
SPRINGFIELD�察�Feb 7�察�1858
MY DEAR SIR��
Yesterday morning the court overruled the demurrer to Hatches
return in the mandamus case。 McClernand was present�察�said nothing
about pleading over�察�and so I suppose the matter is ended。
The court gave no reason for the decision�察�but Peck tells me
confidentially that they were unanimous in the opinion that even
if the Gov'r had signed the bill purposely�察�he h