letters to his son, 1749-第22部分

按键盘上方向键 ← 或 → 可快速上下翻页，按键盘上的 Enter 键可回到本书目录页，按键盘上方向键 ↑ 可回到本页顶部！
————未阅读完？加入书签已便下次继续阅读！


orld。　　Some　Madame　de　l'Ursay　would　be　the　proper　person。　　In　short；　I　can　assure　you；　that　he　has　everything　which　Lord　Chesterfield　can　wish　him；　excepting　that　carriage；　those　graces；　and　the　style　used　in　the　best　company；　which　he　will　certainly　acquire　in　time；　and　by　frequenting　the　polite　world。　　If　he　should　not；　it　would　be　great　pity；　since　he　so　well　deserves　to　possess　them。　　You　know　their　importance。　　My　Lord；　his　father；　knows　it　too；　he　being　master　of　them　all。　　To　conclude；　if　little　Stanhope　acquires　the　graces；　I　promise　you　he　will　make　his　way；　if　not；　he　will　be　stopped　in　a　course；　the　goal　of　which　he　might　attain　with　honor。＇

Tell　Mr。　Harte　that　I　have　this　moment　received　his　letter　of　the　22d；　N。　S。；　and　that　I　approve　extremely　of　the　long　stay　you　have　made　at　Venice。　　I　love　long　residences　at　capitals；　running　post　through　different　places　is　a　most　unprofitable　way　of　traveling；　and　admits　of　no　application。　　Adieu。

You　see；　by　this　extract；　of　what　consequence　other　people　think　these　things。　　Therefore；　I　hope　you　will　no　longer　look　upon　them　as　trifles。　It　is　the　character　of　an　able　man　to　despise　little　things　in　great　business：　but　then　he　knows　what　things　are　little；　and　what　not。　　He　does　not　suppose　things　are　little；　because　they　are　commonly　called　so：　but　by　the　consequences　that　may　or　may　not　attend　them。　　If　gaining　people's　affections；　and　interesting　their　hearts　in　your　favor；　be　of　consequence；　as　it　undoubtedly　is；　he　knows　very　well　that　a　happy　concurrence　of　all　those；　commonly　called　little　things；　manners；　air；　address；　graces；　etc。；　is　of　the　utmost　consequence；　and　will　never　be　at　rest　till　he　has　acquired　them。　　The　world　is　taken　by　the　outside　of　things；　and　we　must　take　the　world　as　it　is；　you　nor　I　cannot　set　it　right。　　I　know；　at　this　time；　a　man　of　great　quality　and　station；　who　has　not　the　parts　of　a　porter；　but　raised　himself　to　the　station　he　is　in；　singly　by　having　a　graceful　figure；　polite　manners；　and　an　engaging　address；　which；　by　the　way；　he　only　acquired　by　habit；　for　he　had　not　sense　enough　to　get　them　by　reflection。　　Parts　and　habit　should　conspire　to　complete　you。　　You　will　have　the　habit　of　good　company；　and　you　have　reflection　in　your　power。




LETTER　XCIII

LONDON；　December　5；　O。　S。　　1749。

DEAR　BOY：　Those　who　suppose　that　men　in　general　act　rationally；　because　they　are　called　rational　creatures；　know　very　little　of　the　world；　and　if　they　act　themselves　upon　that　supposition；　will　nine　times　in　ten　find　themselves　grossly　mistaken。　　That　man　is；　'animal　bipes；　implume；　risibile'；　I　entirely　agree；　but　for　the　'rationale'；　I　can　only　allow　it　him　'in　actu　primo'　（to　talk　logic）　and　seldom　in　'actu　secundo'。　　Thus；　the　speculative；　cloistered　pedant；　in　his　solitary　cell；　forms　systems　of　things　as　they　should　be；　not　as　they　are；　and　writes　as　decisively　and　absurdly　upon　war；　politics；　manners；　and　characters；　as　that　pedant　talked；　who　was　so　kind　as　to　instruct　Hannibal　in　the　art　of　war。　　Such　closet　politicians　never　fail　to　assign　the　deepest　motives　for　the　most　trifling　actions；　instead　of　often　ascribing　the　greatest　actions　to　the　most　trifling　causes；　in　which　they　would　be　much　seldomer　mistaken。　They　read　and　write　of　kings；　heroes；　and　statesmen；　as　never　doing　anything　but　upon　the　deepest　principles　of　sound　policy。　　But　those　who　see　and　observe　kings；　heroes；　and　statesmen；　discover　that　they　have　headaches；　indigestions；　humors；　and　passions；　just　like　other　people；　everyone　of　which；　in　their　turns；　determine　their　wills；　in　defiance　of　their　reason。　　Had　we　only　read　in　the　〃Life　of　Alexander；〃　that　he　burned　Persepolis；　it　would　doubtless　have　been　accounted　for　from　deep　policy：　we　should　have　been　told；　that　his　new　conquest　could　not　have　been　secured　without　the　destruction　of　that　capital；　which　would　have　been　the　constant　seat　of　cabals；　conspiracies；　and　revolts。　　But；　luckily；　we　are　informed　at　the　same　time；　that　this　hero；　this　demi…god；　this　son　and　heir　of　Jupiter　Ammon；　happened　to　get　extremely　drunk　with　his　w…e；　and；　by　way　of　frolic；　destroyed　one　of　the　finest　cities　in　the　world。　　Read　men；　therefore；　yourself；　not　in　books　but　in　nature。　Adopt　no　systems；　but　study　them　yourself。　　Observe　their　weaknesses；　their　passions；　their　humors；　of　all　which　their　understandings　are；　nine　times　in　ten；　the　dupes。　　You　will　then　know　that　they　are　to　be　gained；　influenced；　or　led；　much　oftener　by　little　things　than　by　great　ones；　and；　consequently；　you　will　no　longer　think　those　things　little；　which　tend　to　such　great　purposes。

Let　us　apply　this　now　to　the　particular　object　of　this　letter；　I　mean；　speaking　in；　and　influencing　public　assemblies。　　The　nature　of　our　constitution　makes　eloquence　more　useful；　and　more　necessary；　in　this　country　than　in　any　other　in　Europe。　　A　certain　degree　of　good　sense　and　knowledge　is　requisite　for　that；　as　well　as　for　everything　else；　but　beyond　that；　the　purity　of　diction；　the　elegance　of　style；　the　harmony　of　periods；　a　pleasing　elocution；　and　a　graceful　action；　are　the　things　which　a　public　speaker　should　attend　to　the　most；　because　his　audience　certainly　does；　and　understands　them　the　best；　or　rather　indeed　understands　little　else。　　The　late　Lord　Chancellor　Cowper's　strength　as　an　orator　lay　by　no　means　in　his　reasonings；　for　he　often　hazarded　very　weak　ones。　　But　such　was　the　purity　and　elegance　of　his　style；　such　the　propriety　and　charms　of　his　elocution；　and　such　the　gracefulness　of　his　action；　that　he　never　spoke　without　universal　applause；　the　ears　and　the　eyes　gave　him　up　the　hearts　and　the　understandings　of　the　audience。　　On　the　contrary；　the　late　Lord　Townshend　always　spoke　materially；　with　argument　and　knowledge；　but　never　pleased。　　Why？　　His　diction　was　not　only　inelegant；　but　frequently　ungrammatical；　always　vulgar；　his　cadences　false；　his　voice　unharmonious；　and　his　action　ungraceful。　　Nobody　heard　him　with　patience；　and　the　young　fellows　used　to　joke　upon　him；　and　repeat　his　inaccuracies。　　The　late　Duke　of　Argyle；　though　the　weakest　reasoner；　was　the　most　pleasing　speaker　I　ever　knew　in　my　life。　　He　charmed；　he　warmed；　he　forcibly　ravished　the　audience；　not　by　his　matter　certainly；　but　by　his　manner　of　delivering　it。　　A　most　genteel　figure；　a　graceful；　noble　air；　an　harmonious　voice；　an　elegance　of　style；　and　a　strength　of　emphasis；　conspired　to　make　him　the　most　affecting；　persuasive；　and　applauded　speaker　I　ever　saw。　　I　was　captivated　like　others；　but　when　I　came　home；　and　coolly　considered　what　he　had　said；　stripped　of　all　those　ornaments　in　which　he　had　dressed　it；　I　often　found　the　matter　flimsy；　the　arguments　weak；　and　I　was　convinced　of　the　power　of　those　adventitious　concurring　circumstances；　which　ignorance　of　mankind　only　calls　trifling　ones。　　Cicero；　in　his　book　'De　Oratore'；　in　order　to　raise　the　dignity　of　that　profession　which　he　well　knew　himself　to　be　at　the　head　of；　asserts　that　a　complete　orator　must　be　a　complete　everything；　lawyer；　philosopher；　divine；　etc。　　That　would　be　extremely　well；　if　it　were　possible：　but　man's　life　is　not　long　enough；　and　I　hold　him　to　be　the　completest　orator；　who　speaks　the　best　upon　that　subject　which　occurs；　whose　happy　choice　of　words；　whose　lively　imagination；　whose　elocution　and　action　adorn　and　grace　his　matter；　at　the　same　time　that　they　excite　the　attention　and　engage　the　passions　of　his　audience。

You　will　be　of　the　House　of　Commons　as　soon　as　you　are　of　age；　and　you　must　first　make　a　figure　there；　if　you　would　make　a　figure；　or　a　fortune；　in　your　country。　　This　you　can　never　do　without　that　correctness　and　elegance　in　your　own　language；　which　you　now　seem　to　neglect；　and　which　you　have　entirely　to　learn。　　Fortunately　for　you；　it　is　to　be　learned。　Care　and　observation　will　do　it；　but　do　not　flatter　yourself；　that　all　the　knowledge；　sense；　and　reasoning　in　the　world　will　ever　make　you　a　popular　and　applauded　speaker；　without　the　ornaments　and　the　graces　of　style；　elocution；　and　action。　　Sense　and　argument；　though　coarsely　delivered；　will　have　their　weight　in　a　private　conversation；　with　two　or　three　people　of　sense；　but　in　a　public　assembly　they　will　have　none；　if　naked　and　destitute　of　the　advantages　I　have　mentioned。　　Cardinal　de　Retz　observes；　very　justly；　that　every　numerous　assembly　is　a　mob；　influenced　by　their　passions；　humors；　and　affections；　which　nothing　but　eloquence　ever　did　or　ever　can　engage。　　This　is　so　important　a　consideration　for　everybody　in　this　country；　and　more　particularly　for　you；　that　I　earnestly　recommend　it　to　your　most　serious　care　and　attention。　　Mind　your　diction；　in　whatever　language　you　either　write　or　speak；　contract　a　habit　of　correctness　and　elegance。　　Consider　your　style；　even　in　the　freest　conversation　and　most　familiar　letters。　　After；　at　least；　if　not　before；　you　have　said　a　thing；　reflect　if　you　could　not　have　said　it　better。　　Where　you　doubt　of　the　propriety　or　elegance　of　a　word　or　a　phrase；　consult　some　good　dead　or　living　authority　in　that　language。　　Use　yourself　to　translate；　from　various　languages　into　English；　correct　those　translations　till　they　satisfy　your　ear；　as　well　as　your　understanding。　And　be　convinced　of　this　truth；　that　the　best　sense　and　reason　in　the　world　will　be　as　unwelcome　in　a　public　assembly；　without　these　ornaments；　as　they　will　in　public　companies；　without　the　assistance　of　manners　and　politeness。　　If　you　will　please　people；　you　must　please　them　in　their　own　way；　and；　as　you　cannot　make　them　what　they　should　be；　you　must　take　them　as　they　are。　　I　repeat　it　again；　they　are　only　to　be　taken　by　'agremens'；　and　by　what　flatters　their　senses　and　their　hearts。　　Rabelais　first　wrote　a　most　excellent　book；　which　nobody　liked；　then；　determined　to　conform　to　the　public　taste；　he　wrote　Gargantua　and　Pantagruel；　which　everybody　liked；　extravagant　as　it　was。　　Adieu。




LETTER　XCIV

LONDON；　December　9；　O。　S。　　1749。

DEAR　BOY：　It　is　now　above　forty　years　since　I　have　never　spoken　nor　written　one　single　word；　without　giving　myself　at　least　one　moment's　time　to　consider　whether　it　was　a　good　or　a　bad　one；　and　whether　I　could　not　find　out　a　better　in　its　place。　　An　unharmonious　and　rugged　period；　at　this　time；　shocks　my　ears；　and　I；　like　all　th